† Corresponding author. E-mail:
The entropy squeezing for a three-level atom interacting with a single-model field is studied. A general definition of entropy squeezing for three-level atom is given according to entropic uncertainty relation of three-level system, and the calculation formalism of entropy is derived for a cascade three-level atom. By using numerical calculation, the entropy squeezing properties of a cascade three-level atom are examined. Our results show that, three-level atom can generate obvious entropy squeezing effect via choosing appropriate superposition state of three-level atom. Our results are meaningful for preparing three-level system information resources with ultra-low quantum noise.
The precision measurement of observable quantities in quantum physical experiments is greatly restricted by quantum noises (quantum uncertainty[1]) of quantum systems. Hence, breaking through the restriction of quantum noises and realizing quantum physical experiments with ultra-low quantum noise is a strong expectation for physical scientists. As we know, the suppression of quantum noises in quantum systems via squeezing effects is one of the most outstanding achievements in modern quantum optics over the last few years. Therefore, many squeezing effects have been investigated, such as the atomic squeezing. It should be pointed out that quantum information entropy is a accurate measure of the atomic squeezing, and one of our authors has defined the entropy squeezing (ES) for a two-level atom by using quantum information entropy according to entropic uncertainty relation based on two conjugate observables,[2] which overcomes the limitation of the definition of squeezing via the variance of the system observable according to Heisenberg uncertainty relation. For more than a decade, the entropy squeezing (ES) properties of quantum system have been investigated widely. Such as, Yu and Fang have studied the steady and optimal entropy squeezing of a two-level atom with quantum-jump-based feedback and classical driving in a dissipative cavity and provided a scheme of generating steady and optimal entropy squeezing in the two-level system;[3] Wang has investigated sustained optimal entropy squeezing of a two-level atom via non-Hermitian operation and provided a scheme for generating the sustained optimal entropy squeezing of the atom via non-Hermitian operation;[4] Xiao has studied the entropy squeezing of a two-level system by detuning in non-Markovian environments and shown that the atomic entropic squeezing can be protected for a long time when both the non-Markovian effect and detuning are present simultaneously;[5] the entropy squeezing of a two-level atom in Jaynes–Commings model has been reported widely;[6] Zou has studied the quantum entropic uncertainty relation and entanglement witness in the two-atom system coupling with the non-Markovian environments.[7,8] However, these results are obtained only in the case of two-level atom, the entropy squeezing properties of three-level atom have not yet been involved until now.
On the other hand, as we know, three-level system has more obvious advantages than two-level system for the representation of quantum information,[9,10] the key distribution scheme of a three-level entanglement system is more effective than the two-level system for preventing eavesdropping in cryptography,[11] and three-level quantum systems have more obvious quantum nonlocality than the two-level system.[12] Therefore, three-level system with ultra-low quantum noise is a more useful information resource, which means that the study of entropic squeezing of three-level system becomes very meaningful in quantum information processing. In this paper, we study the entropy squeezing of three-level atom interacting with a single-mode field. The outline of this paper is as follows. In Section
Since the entropy squeezing of three-level atom has not been discussed before, we first give a general definition of the entropy squeezing for a three-level atom. A three-level atom can be described by dipole operators[13,14]
For three complementary observables
For the convenience of the following discussion, we also give the definition of variance squeezing based on the Heisenberg uncertainty relation. When the variance in the component
We are interested in the case that equation (
In this section, we consider a cascade three-level atom interacting with a single-mode field. The transition frequencies between
For the initial condition Eq. (
In order to obtain the entropic calculation formalism of the spin operators of the cascade three-level atom, we give the concrete form of the spin operators as
Using Eqs. (
Employing the reduced operator given by Eq. (
In this section, we examine numerical results for the atomic entropy squeezing. For comparison, we also consider the atomic variance squeezing and atomic inversion.
The time evolution of the squeezing factors
Figure
The entropy and variance squeezing factors are presented in Fig.
From Figs.
It is worth pointing out that, the results above obtained for the entropy squeezing for a cascade three-level atom interacting with a single-model field is based on a universally adapted spin operator given by Eq. (
In conclusion, we have studied the entropy squeezing properties for a cascade three-level atom interacting with a single-model field. First, a general definition of entropy squeezing of a three-level atom is given by using quantum information entropy according to entropic uncertainty relation of three-level atom. Secondly, the reduced density matrix is obtained, and the calculation formalism of entropy is derived for a cascade three-level atom. Finally, we analyze the properties of entropy squeezing of a three-level cascade atom by using numerical calculation. Our results show that, a cascaded three-level atom interacting with a single-model field can generate obvious entropy squeezing effect via choosing appropriate superposition state of three-level atom. Our results are meaningful for preparing three-level system information resources with ultra-low quantum noise.
[1] | |
[2] | |
[3] | |
[4] | |
[5] | |
[6] | |
[7] | |
[8] | |
[9] | |
[10] | |
[11] | |
[12] | |
[13] | |
[14] | |
[15] | |
[16] |